ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
2R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
4R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
5R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
1L Rating: 2.3
1L Comment: 
---------------------------------------
2R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
2R Rating: 2.8
2R Comment: 
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
3L Rating: 1.8
3L Comment: 
---------------------------------------
4R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
4R Rating: 1.0
4R Comment: awful distortions
---------------------------------------
5R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav
5R Rating: 1.0
5R Comment: same problems and same intensity (even worse it seems) as 4R
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
    6 out of 8, pval = 0.145
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
    6 out of 8, pval = 0.145
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\ATrain [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
