ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
2L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
4R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
5R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:
Tested on beginning (1.0 - 5.0)
---------------------------------------
1L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
1L Rating: 1.0
1L Comment: 
---------------------------------------
2L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
2L Rating: 3.0
2L Comment: Synthetic sound (muffled) and pre-echo (moderate)
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
3L Rating: 2.0
3L Comment: muffled. Not very pleasant, despite of a moderate level of smearing (for mp3 at 96 kbps).
---------------------------------------
4R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
4R Rating: 1.7
4R Comment: severe artifacts accompagning terrible pre-echo. Very noisy.
---------------------------------------
5R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav
5R Rating: 1.3
5R Comment: 
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\FloorEssence [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
