ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav
2R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
3R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
4R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
5L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav
1R Rating: 1.0
1R Comment: 
---------------------------------------
2R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
2R Rating: 2.8
2R Comment: 
---------------------------------------
3R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
3R Rating: 2.5
3R Comment: very close to 2R, but cymbals are less powerful (less high frequencies probably)
---------------------------------------
4R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
4R Rating: 2.0
4R Comment: good, but suffers on the beginning. Probably a VBR encoding (V7 I would say).
---------------------------------------
5L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
5L Rating: 1.4
5L Comment: 
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\macabre [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
