ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
2L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
4L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav
5R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
1R Rating: 2.0
1R Comment: 
---------------------------------------
2L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
2L Rating: 2.0
2L Comment: 
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
3L Rating: 4.0
3L Comment: Damned! Impressive compared to other encodings. Is it really 96 kbps encoding?
---------------------------------------
4L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav
4L Rating: 1.0
4L Comment: 
---------------------------------------
5R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
5R Rating: 3.0
5R Comment: 
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\Waiting [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
