ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
2R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
4L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
5R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - VBR - V8].wav
1L Rating: 1.0
1L Comment: awfully distorted.
---------------------------------------
2R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav
2R Rating: 2.3
2R Comment: distorted and smeared.
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
3L Rating: 2.7
3L Comment: same comment. Less artifacts
---------------------------------------
4L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.90.3 - ABR - 096].wav
4L Rating: 1.4
4L Comment: very badly distorted (doesn't sound like castanets anymore)
---------------------------------------
5R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.96.1 - ABR - 096].wav
5R Rating: 1.4
5R Comment: globally the same
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - ABR - 096 - XX10].wav vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\096 kbps\bonus\castanets2 [3.97a5 - VBR - V7].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
