ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
2L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
4L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
1R Rating: 3.4
1R Comment: annoying pre-echo, and slightly distorted.
---------------------------------------
2L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
2L Rating: 3.2
2L Comment: similar, maybe slightly inferior.
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
3L Rating: 2.9
3L Comment: less pre-echo, but still audible. Slightly more distorted than other files (can't define it: something like electronic noise between attacks - other encodings are free from this distortion)
---------------------------------------
4L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
4L Rating: 4.0
4L Comment: clearly the best.

---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\FloorEssence [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
