ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
2L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
4L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
1R Rating: 1.8
1R Comment: terrible ringing => noise is instable; percussive instrument sounds messy, wind instrument is weird.
---------------------------------------
2L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
2L Rating: 3.5
2L Comment: percussive instrument sounds hollow and acid
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
3L Rating: 4.0
3L Comment: some acidity, but very good
---------------------------------------
4L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
4L Rating: 3.0
4L Comment: problems are slightly more annoying than 2L
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
    7 out of 8, pval = 0.035
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\fossiles [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
    7 out of 8, pval = 0.035
