ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
2L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
3R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
4L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:
ABX range: 00:01.100 - 00:05.100
---------------------------------------
1R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
1R Rating: 3.2
1R Comment: terribly distorted on the first second [invalid range]. Then, it sounds much better. Nevertheless, cymbals are still distorted (smearing, and false colour).
---------------------------------------
2L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
2L Rating: 3.5
2L Comment: cymbal is too distorted for my taste. Slightly better than 1R [and also less distorted during the first second]
---------------------------------------
3R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
3R Rating: 4.2
3R Comment: minor difference
---------------------------------------
4L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
4L Rating: 4.2
4L Comment: same comment
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
    7 out of 8, pval = 0.035
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\TheSource [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
    7 out of 8, pval = 0.035
