ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
2R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
4R = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
1R Rating: 4.0
1R Comment: pre-echo and noisy attacks. A bit dirty, but not very annoying.
---------------------------------------
2R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
2R Rating: 2.0
2R Comment: ringing issue. Like excessive noise reduction, leading to fluctuant noise and distortions on some musical parts of the signal.
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
3L Rating: 3.5
3L Comment: excessive pre-echo. Slight ringing, similar to 2R, but much less irritating.
---------------------------------------
4R File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
4R Rating: 4.7
4R Comment: 
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\wayitis [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
    6 out of 8, pval = 0.145
