ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname: 

1L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
2L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
3L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
4L = D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav

---------------------------------------
General Comments:

---------------------------------------
1L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
1L Rating: 4.3
1L Comment: the closest to transparency, even on the most difficult moment
---------------------------------------
2L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
2L Rating: 3.5
2L Comment: noisy micro-attacks. A bit annoying
---------------------------------------
3L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
3L Rating: 2.5
3L Comment: even noisier; slightly distorted (like 'boiling oil')
---------------------------------------
4L File: D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
4L Rating: 3.0
4L Comment: could be compared to 2L, but noise is fluctuant, and a bit louder too.
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - VBR - V4 --vbr-new].wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.004
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - ABR - 160 - XX10].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.97a5 - VBR - V4].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
Original vs D:\lame test\ff123 suite\160 kbps\Orion II (2.1) [3.90.3 - ABR - 160].wav
    5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
